The difference between self-exclusion and account blocking

Introduction

If necessary, stop playing online casinos offer two main ways: self-exclusion and account blocking. Both tools restrict access, but work differently and fit different scenarios. Understanding the differences will help you choose the best protection method.

1. The essence of the mechanic

2. When to use self-exclusion

1. Multi-platform risk

If you play on different sites at once.

2. The need for a complete cooling window

The desire to exclude even the thought of returning to rates.

3. Relapse prevention

After breakdowns and repeated attempts of restrictions at individual operators.

Plus: covers the entire industry of licensed operators, turns off mailings, does not allow you to register again.

Minus: requires contacting a centralized registry and confirming data.

3. When an account lock is appropriate

1. Single operator

If you play mainly on one site and want to quickly restrict access.

2. Short term limitation

Built-in terms of "1 day," "7 days" to test your own willpower.

3. Measure testing

Try the technical barrier before deciding on tougher self-exclusion.

Plus: instant activation through the site interface, often without identity confirmation.

Minus: does not protect against changing login, e-mail or VPN bypass, covers only one operator.

4. Combined approach

1. First, lock your account

Quick "first line" to assess your own motivation.

2. Next - self-exclusion

After a short lock period or in case of a breakdown, go to BetStop.

3. Technical barriers

Install Gamban/BetBlocker and DNS filters to close bypass loopholes.

Conclusion

Self-exclusion is a reliable long-term solution that blocks all licensed sites and mailings. Account blocking is a quick way to stop playing on a specific platform for a limited time. For maximum protection, combine both methods with technical barriers and professional support.